Course Profile
Course ini merupakan foundation course Program 03. Fokus utamanya bukan hafalan debit-kredit, melainkan kemampuan memahami business event dan evidence sebelum menentukan accounting treatment.
Course Outcomes
Peserta harus menunjukkan kemampuan nyata melalui evidence, bukan hanya menjawab pertanyaan konseptual.
Program Outcome → Course Outcome Mapping
| Course Outcome | Program Outcome | Primary Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| CO1 | PO1 | Business-process and transaction-cycle analysis |
| CO2 | PO1 · PO8 | Economic-substance reasoning |
| CO3 | PO1 · PO7 | Source-document and evidence evaluation |
| CO4 | PO7 · PO8 | Risk and internal-control analysis |
| CO5 | PO8 · PO10 · PO11 | AI challenge and professional conclusion |
5 Learning Modules
Klik masing-masing module untuk membuka learning outcome, concepts, reading, field example, activity, practice dan evidence.
M1
Business Processes and Transaction Cycles
Understand business before accounting.
Map a business process from event initiation through authorization, execution, documentation and accounting capture.
- Revenue cycle
- Expenditure cycle
- Production cycle
- Payroll cycle
- Financing cycle
- Event → transaction → record
Kimmel, Weygandt & Mitchell, Financial Accounting, 10th ed., accounting cycle and transaction analysis sections.
Customer order → sales approval → delivery → invoice → receivable → collection. Peserta menunjukkan di titik mana business event berubah menjadi accounting evidence.
Create an end-to-end process map for order-to-cash and procure-to-pay.
Process map + explanation of transaction trigger, responsible function and accounting consequence.
M2
Source Documents and Transaction Evidence
Learn to read evidence before recording transactions.
Evaluate whether documents and digital records provide sufficient and relevant evidence for a business transaction.
- Purchase order
- Sales order
- Invoice
- Receiving report
- Delivery note
- Contract
- Bank evidence
- Approval record
Romney, Steinbart, Summers & Wood, Accounting Information Systems, 16th ed., transaction cycles and documentation sections.
Invoice diterbitkan 28 December, tetapi barang diterima 3 January. Peserta harus menentukan dokumen mana yang paling relevan untuk cutoff.
Document matching: PO + invoice + GRR + payment evidence. Identify missing or conflicting evidence.
Evidence sufficiency memo: what exists, what is missing, and what must be verified.
M3
Economic Substance and Accounting Implications
Move from documents to accounting judgment.
Determine the economic substance and accounting consequences of a transaction using relevant evidence and standards.
- Recognition
- Measurement
- Control
- Cutoff
- Capital versus expense
- Assets and liabilities
- Revenue and expense timing
IASB Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting, revised 2018, IFRS Foundation. Applicable PSAK / IFRS standards are used according to transaction type.
Equipment purchase Rp480 million, installation Rp25 million, operator training Rp8 million. Determine which expenditure forms part of asset cost.
Prepare transaction analysis, recognition rationale, measurement calculation and proposed accounting entry.
Accounting position memo supported by source documents and professional-standard reasoning.
M4
Transaction Risks and Internal Control Points
Ask what can go wrong and how it should be controlled.
Identify financial-reporting, fraud, authorization, processing and cutoff risks within a transaction cycle.
- Unauthorized transaction
- Duplicate transaction
- Incorrect amount
- Wrong period
- Missing evidence
- Incorrect classification
- Fraudulent documentation
- Authorization
- Segregation of duties
- Three-way matching
- Reconciliation
- Access control
- Exception review
- Audit trail
Supplier invoice enters the ERP before physical receipt. What prevents premature recognition?
Create Risk → Control → Evidence mapping for one transaction cycle.
Risk-control matrix with control objective, control owner and expected evidence.
M5
AI-Assisted Transaction Interpretation & Professional Judgment
Use AI, but do not surrender judgment to AI.
Use AI to support transaction analysis while independently validating facts, assumptions, standards and conclusions.
- Document extraction
- Transaction classification
- Accounting suggestion
- Risk identification
- Anomaly explanation
- Draft professional memo
- Hallucination
- Wrong standard
- Incorrect period
- Missing document context
- Bias
- Overconfidence
AI concludes that invoice date automatically determines recognition and all training costs are capitalized. Participant must challenge both assertions.
AI challenge: accept, modify or reject an AI-generated accounting conclusion with evidence.
AI critique + revised conclusion + explanation of remaining uncertainty.
Required Textbooks & Professional References
Financial Accounting: Tools for Business Decision Making
Paul D. Kimmel, Jerry J. Weygandt, Jill E. Mitchell. 10th Edition. Wiley, 2021. ISBN 978-1-119-79108-9. Primary foundation for transaction analysis, accounting cycle and financial-information interpretation.
Accounting Information Systems
Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart, Scott L. Summers, David A. Wood. 16th Edition. Pearson, 2025. ISBN 978-0-13-811441-1. Primary reference for transaction cycles, documentation, internal control, data and accounting information systems.
Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
International Accounting Standards Board. Revised 2018. IFRS Foundation, London. Used for recognition, measurement, economic substance and decision-useful information.
Applicable SAK Indonesia / IFRS Accounting Standards
Current applicable edition at the time of delivery. Specific standards are selected according to the transaction being analyzed. Professional standards take precedence over simplified learning examples.
Professional Case Library
Professional cases mengubah konsep menjadi evidence. BTI-001 mengintegrasikan seluruh Course Outcomes.
BTI-001 — Acquisition of Production Equipment
Enam source documents, transaction recognition, capitalization calculation, cutoff risk, internal control, AI challenge dan professional conclusion.
Open BTI-001 →Field Practice Across M1–M5
Peserta membangun satu portfolio berisi: business-process map, source-document review, accounting position memo, risk-control matrix, dan AI challenge memo. Portfolio ini menjadi evidence tambahan untuk Course Attainment.
Assessment & Evidence Mix
Course tidak dinilai hanya dengan quiz. Nilai akhir menggabungkan knowledge, performance dan professional judgment evidence.
Short quizzes dan concept checks untuk memastikan fondasi terminology dan transaction logic.
Process map, document review, accounting memo, risk-control matrix dan AI critique.
Integrated evidence: documents → analysis → accounting → risk → AI challenge → judgment.
Lecturer review of reasoning, evidence quality, professional skepticism and Course Outcomes attainment.
Professional Performance Rubric
| Criterion | Weight | Competent Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Business & Transaction Understanding | 20% | Correctly reconstructs the business event and distinguishes document date, event date and accounting relevance. |
| Evidence Evaluation | 20% | Identifies relevant, missing and conflicting evidence. |
| Accounting Reasoning | 25% | Applies economic substance, recognition and measurement logically. |
| Risk & Control Analysis | 15% | Identifies material risks and proposes relevant control responses. |
| AI Challenge & Professional Judgment | 20% | Does not accept AI automatically; validates assumptions, explains uncertainty and formulates defensible conclusion. |
Course Completion & Attainment Rules
Evidence Produced by the Participant
AI Use, Integrity & Accountability
AI may assist. AI may not replace professional responsibility.
Peserta diperbolehkan menggunakan AI pada aktivitas yang memang mengizinkannya, tetapi peserta tetap wajib memahami, memeriksa dan mempertanggungjawabkan seluruh output yang diserahkan.
- AI-generated answers must be critically reviewed.
- Source documents and standards must be independently checked.
- Fabricated evidence is prohibited.
- Uncertainty must be disclosed, not hidden.
- Professional conclusion remains the participant's responsibility.
- Lecturer human review determines final competency evidence.